Handshakes Could Spread DNA To Things You Didn’t Touch.
Articles Blog

Handshakes Could Spread DNA To Things You Didn’t Touch.

Welcome to space train,
what If I told you that, A 10-second handshake could transfer a person’s
DNA to an object that the person never touched. In handshaking experiments, people who never
picked up a knife became the major source of DNA on the handle about 7 percent of the
time, forensic scientist Cynthia Cale, reported February 21 of 2019. at the annual meeting
of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. That DNA was transferred to the knife when
the person’s handshaking partner grasped the handle. In a separate study, the last person to touch
an object such as a communal pitcher was often not the one who left the most DNA behind,
Leann Rizor, a forensic anthropologist who did the work at the University of Indianapolis,
reported at the meeting. The findings suggest that even brief contact
with another person or object, could spread DNA far and wide,
which could complicate crime scene investigations. While the results don’t mean DNA evidence
is unreliable, Rizor and Cale said, investigators should be careful to account for these accidental
transfers. In real-world situations, it’s probably
rare to find people’s DNA in places they’ve never been or on an object they’ve never
handled, says forensic geneticist. Left-behind DNA is usually unstable and breaks
down with time, she says. “We can’t discount [the idea],” “but
we shouldn’t use it to throw the evidence out in every single case.” Previously, Cale, of the Houston Forensic
Science Center, found that shaking hands for two minutes could transfer one person’s
DNA to an object by way of the other person’s hand. But many critics said that two minutes is
an unrealistically long time for a handshake. In the new experiments, Cale shortened the
handshaking time to 10 seconds. Even briefer contact might also transfer DNA. In Rizor’s experiment, four University of
Indianapolis students sat around a table and poured beverages from a communal pitcher. Other students watching the experiment were
free to leave the room, talk and move around to simulate conditions in a restaurant. As each student at the table handled the pitcher
and a plastic cup, researchers swabbed the pitcher handle, cups and the students’ hands
for DNA. DNA from students at the table was on the
pitcher handle and on each other’s cups, even though the volunteers handled only their
own cup and the pitcher. What’s more, DNA from other students in
the room showed up, too, but none of the observers had touched the students at the table or the
pitcher or cups. Observers’ DNA may have spread to the cups
and pitcher through tiny spewed droplets as the onlookers talked, coughed or sneezed. Looking at the amounts of DNA, left behind
on the objects, the researchers couldn’t determine who handled the pitcher last, nor
could they pinpoint how long a person touched the pitcher or cup. The results demonstrate that DNA can transfer
easily in social settings and in unpredictable ways. Some of those results may be explained because
people shed DNA at different rates, Prinz says. But it’s still not clear how often that
type of transferred DNA might skew crime scene investigations. “We’re all still trying to get a handle
on how realistic this is.” so be careful when next time you decide to
shake hands. your DNA can be used in lots of unexpected
places you don’t want to be part of. thats all today. Follow our train, to stay updated on new science

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top