The fascinating (and dangerous) places scientists aren’t exploring | Ella Al-Shamahi
Articles Blog

The fascinating (and dangerous) places scientists aren’t exploring | Ella Al-Shamahi


So I’ve got something that I’m
slightly embarrassed to admit to. At the age of 17, as a creationist, I decided to go to university
to study evolution so that I could destroy it. (Laughter) I failed. I failed so spectacularly
that I’m now an evolutionary biologist. (Applause) So I’m a paleoanthropologist,
I’m a National Geographic Explorer specializing in fossil hunting in caves in unstable, hostile
and disputed territories. And we all know that
if I was a guy and not a girl, that wouldn’t be a job description,
that would be a pick-up line. (Laughter) Now, here’s the thing.
I do not have a death wish. I’m not an adrenaline junkie. I just looked at a map. See, frontline exploratory science
does not happen as much in politically unstable territories. This is a map of all the places
which the British Foreign Office have declared contain
red zones, orange zones or have raised some kind
of a threat warning about. Now I’m going to go out on a limb here
and say that it is a tragedy if we’re not doing frontline exploratory
science in a huge portion of the planet. And so science has a geography problem. Also, as a paleoanthropologist, guys, this is basically a map
of some of the most important places in the human journey. There are almost definitely
fascinating fossils to be found here. But are we looking for them? And so as an undergraduate,
I was repeatedly told that humans, be they ourselves,
homo sapiens, or earlier species, that we left Africa
via the Sinai of Egypt. I’m English, as you can
probably tell from my accent, but I am actually of Arab heritage, and I always say that I’m
very, very Arab on the outside. You know, I can really be passionate. Like, “You’re amazing! I love you!” But on the inside, I’m really English,
so everybody irritates me. (Laughter) It’s true. And the thing is,
my family are Arab from Yemen, and I knew that that channel, Bab-el-Mandeb, is not that much of a feat to cross. And I kept asking myself
this really simple question: if the ancestors to New World monkeys
could somehow cross the Atlantic Ocean, why couldn’t humans cross
that tiny stretch of water? But the thing is, Yemen, compared to, let’s say, Europe, was so understudied that it was something akin
to near virgin territory. But that, along with its location,
made the sheer potential for discovery so exciting, and I had so many questions. When did we first
start using Bab-el-Mandeb? But also, which species of human
besides ourselves made it to Yemen? Might we find a species
as yet unknown to science? And it turned out, I wasn’t the only one
who had noticed Yemen’s potential. There was actually
a few other academics out there. But sadly, due to political instability,
they moved out, and so I moved in. And I was looking for caves: caves because caves
are the original prime real estate. But also because if you’re looking
for fossils in that kind of heat, your best bet for fossil preservation
is always going to be caves. But then, Yemen took
a really sad turn for the worse, and just a few days
before I was due to fly out to Yemen, the civil war escalated
into a regional conflict, the capital’s airport was bombed and Yemen became a no-fly zone. Now, my parents made this decision
before I was born: that I would be born British. I had nothing to do
with the best decision of my life. And now … Now the lucky ones
in my family have escaped, and the others, the others
are being been bombed and send you WhatsApp messages
that make you detest your very existence. This war’s been going on for four years. It’s been going on for over four years,
and it has led to a humanitarian crisis. There is a famine there, a man-made famine. That’s a man-made famine,
so not a natural famine, an entirely man-made famine
that the UN has warned could be the worst famine
the world has seen in a hundred years. This war has made it
clear to me more than ever that no place, no people
deserve to get left behind. And so I was joining these other teams,
and I was forming new collaborations in other unstable places. But I was desperate
to get back into Yemen, because for me, Yemen’s really personal. And so I kept trying to think
of a project I could do in Yemen that would help highlight
what was going on there. And every idea I had just kept failing, or it was just too high-risk,
because let’s be honest, most of Yemen is just too dangerous
for a Western team. But then I was told that Socotra,
a Yemeni island, was safe once you got there. In fact, it turned out there was a few
local and international academics that were still working there. And that got me really excited, because look at Socotra’s
proximity to Africa. And yet we have no idea
when humans arrived on that island. But Socotra, for those of you who know it, well, let’s just say you probably know it
for a completely different reason. You probably know it
as the Galapagos of the Indian Ocean, because it is one of the most
biodiverse places on this earth. But we were also getting information that this incredibly delicate
environment and its people were under threat because they were at the frontline
of both Middle Eastern politics and climate change. And it slowly dawned on me
that Socotra was my Yemen project. And so I wanted to put together
a huge multidisciplinary team. We wanted to cross the archipelago
on foot, camel and dhow boat to conduct a health check of this place. This has only been attempted
once before, and it was in 1999. But the thing is, that is not
an easy thing to pull off. And so we desperately needed a recce, and for those of you who aren’t
familiar with British English, a recce is like a scouting expedition. It’s like a reconnaissance. And I often say that a really big
expedition without a recce is a bit like a first date
without a Facebook stalk. (Laughter) Like, it’s doable, but is it wise? (Laughter) There’s a few too many
knowing laughs in this room. Anyway, so then our recce team thankfully
were no strangers to unstable places, which, let’s be honest,
is kind of important because we were trying to get
to a place between Yemen and Somalia, And after calling in
what felt like a million favors, including to the deputy governor, we finally found ourselves on the move, albeit on a wooden cement cargo ship sailing through pirate waters
in the Indian Ocean with this as a toilet. (Laughter) Can you guys see this? You know how everybody has
their worst toilet story? Well, I’ve never swam
with dolphins before. I just went straight to pooping on them. (Laughter) And also, I genuinely discovered
that I am genuinely less stressed by pirate waters than I am with a cockroach infestation that was so intense that at one point I went belowdeck, and the floor was black and it was moving. (Audience moans) Yeah, and at night there was
three raised platforms to sleep on, but there was only —
let’s say there was four team members, and the thing is, if you got
a raised platform to sleep on, you only had to contend
with a few cockroaches during the night, whereas if you got the floor,
good luck to you. And so I was the only girl in the team
and the whole ship, so I got away without
sleeping on the floor. And then, on, like,
the fourth or fifth night, Martin Edström looks at me and goes,
“Ella, Ella I really believe in equality.” (Laughter) So we were sailing on that
cement cargo ship for three days, and then we slowly started seeing land. And after three years of failing, I was finally seeing Yemen. And there is no feeling on earth
like that start of an expedition. It’s this moment where
you jump out of a jeep or you look up from a boat and you know that
there’s this possibility, it’s small but it’s still there, that you’re about to find something that could add to or change our knowledge
of who we are and where we come from. There is no feeling like it on earth, and it’s a feeling
that so many scientists have but rarely in politically unstable places. Because Western scientists
are discouraged or all-out barred from working in unstable places. But here’s the thing: scientists specialize in the jungle. Scientists work in deep cave systems. Scientists attach themselves to rockets
and blow themselves into outer space. But apparently,
working in an unstable place is deemed too high-risk. It is completely arbitrary. Who here in this room
wasn’t brought up on adventure stories? And most of our heroes
were actually scientists and academics. Science was about going out
into the unknown. It was about truly global exploration,
even if there were risks. And so when did it become acceptable
to make it difficult for science to happen in unstable places? And look, I’m not saying
that all scientists should go off and start working in unstable places. This isn’t some gung-ho call. But here’s the thing: for those who have done the research,
understand security protocol and are trained, stop stopping those who want to. Plus, just because one part of a country
is an active war zone doesn’t mean the whole country is. I’m not saying we should go
into active war zones. But Iraqi Kurdistan looks
very different from Fallujah. And actually, a few months
after I couldn’t get into Yemen, another team adopted me. So Professor Graeme Barker’s team
were actually working in Iraqi Kurdistan, and they were digging up Shanidar Cave. Now, Shanidar Cave a few decades earlier had unveiled a Neanderthal
known as Shanidar 1. Now, for a BBC/PBS TV series
we actually brought Shanidar 1 to life, and I want you guys to meet Ned,
Ned the Neanderthal. Now here’s the coolest thing about Ned. Ned, this guy, you’re meeting him before his injuries. See, it turned out
that Ned was severely disabled. He was in fact so disabled that
there is no way he could have survived without the help of other Neanderthals. And so this was proof that, at least for this population
of Neanderthals at this time, Neanderthals were like us, and they sometimes looked after
those who couldn’t look after themselves. Ned’s an Iraqi Neanderthal. So what else are we missing? What incredible scientific discoveries are we not making
because we’re not looking? And by the way, these places,
they deserve narratives of hope, and science and exploration
can be a part of that. In fact, I would argue
that it can tangibly aid development, and these discoveries
become a huge source of local pride. And that brings me to the second reason
why science has a geography problem. See, we don’t empower
local academics, do we? Like, it’s not lost on me that in my particular field
of paleoanthropology we study human origins, but we have so few diverse scientists. And the thing is, these places
are full of students and academics who are desperate to collaborate, and the truth is that for them, they have fewer security issues than us. I think we constantly forget that for them
it’s not a hostile environment; for them it’s home. I’m telling you, research done in unstable places
with local collaborators can lead to incredible discoveries, and that is what we are
hoping upon hope to do in Socotra. They call Socotra the most alien-looking place on earth, and myself, Leon McCarron, Martin Edström
and Rhys Thwaites-Jones could see why. I mean, look at this place. These places, they’re not hellholes,
they’re not write-offs, they’re the future frontline
of science and exploration. 90 percent of the reptiles on this island, 37 percent of the plant species
exist here and nowhere else on earth, and that includes this species
of dragon’s blood tree, which actually bleeds this red resin. And there’s something else. People on Socotra,
some of them still live in caves, and that is really exciting, because it means if a cave
is prime real estate this century, maybe it was a few thousand years ago. But we need the data to prove it,
the fossils, the stone tools, and so our scouting team
have teamed up with other scientists, anthropologists and storytellers, international as well as local,
like Ahmed Alarqbi, and we are desperate
to shed a light on this place before it’s too late. And now, now we just somehow
need to get back for that really big expedition, because science, science has a geography problem. You guys have been
a really lovely audience. Thank you. (Applause)

95 thoughts on “The fascinating (and dangerous) places scientists aren’t exploring | Ella Al-Shamahi

  1. We know so little about the brain and its potential, yet here we are, aiming for Mars.
    Travel within and understand life.

  2. The North Pole & The South Pole, they may have went there, but they are hiding the lost city of atlantis in the north pole and the end of the world or better known as the dome/firmament in the south. Don’t believe me?, then you have not even tried to research.

  3. There was a good interview of her in New Scientist, but I think it's paywalled : https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23731620-300-the-fossil-finder-who-cant-wait-to-return-to-war-torn-yemen/

  4. Sad. You could hear the pain in her voice, it touches your heart when your families involved. Wish I could help, just dont fancy getting shot at.

  5. What a fantastic ted talk. And so personal for her, it feels like listening to a friend talk about a problem they see in their daily life and watching them brainstorm, finding ways to solve it. Problem is, i didn't catch a way for the public to help with this. Is there one?

  6. Caves are my favorite places on earth! I bums me out to think I can't go into Mexico's giant crystal cave (albeit for a different kind of inhospitability 😀) Glad to know I'm not alone! Proud NSS member and member of the West Virginia Cave Conservancy. 💚💚🌍🌍

  7. Wow!…but I disagree about science having a geography problem…science has a religious power mongering bigoted mountain with the brain of a gnat to overcome.

  8. “Why aren’t we looking in those places” well mostly because people don’t wanna risk their life or health for that kind of career

  9. The major crime is that to God time does not exist! And this is why both beliefs are true. Only man has developed time as a measurement tool not a RULE!

  10. Why do all TED talks have to contain sexist, feminist, racist and political views now????
    This used to be enjoyable without all the opinion clouding the knowledge.

  11. 14:11
    "Research done in unstable places with local collaborators can lead to incredible discoveries. I think we constantly forget that for them it's not a hostile environment, for them it's home."

    This was a powerful, emotional, and eye-opening story. Keep up the great work, Ella.

  12. Caves are built and Science misses that answer because they have never observed the question. My research is on the ancient ones and there duties here on life. Ian Armstrong aka Tinman Bigfoot Tracker Channel Canada British Columbia BC.

  13. Great presentation, Dr. Al-Shamahi! For some reason, your enthusiasm and high qualifications remind me of another great English, female, paleontologist/anthropologist- Dr.Alice Roberts. Good luck in your future,

  14. Ahhh nice. Finally some interesting and inspiring brain food from TED. The alt-left virtue signaling videos were getting old.

  15. It was really interesting and left me wanting to know more and listening to your tedtalk has been a pleasure. It’s been a while since I’ve watched tedtalk videos. Really enjoyed it

  16. She's intelligent and interesting. Her communication of the subject matter is exceptional. Her compassion for we humans is real and serious.

  17. "Too high risk"

    Well, maybe because taking a team into a war torn region will equate to more than simple loss of life. There are worst things than death.

    Launching manned rockets into space, failure = death.
    Exploring deep caves around globe, failure = difficult rescue mission to get them out if not death
    Searching the rain forest, failure = possible disease/sickness, difficult evacuations, or possible death

    What does a war torn region offer to scientists? Hopefully they will only scientific advancement and success.

    More likely, the war finds you. Warlords, rival tribes, pirates, etc etc etc capture science teams and will torture them, beat them, maybe sexually abused/raped them or hold them ransom for ridiculous amounts of money if the team members are men. For the women captured on the team it is far, far worse. They will be raped repeatedly by multiple men, beaten repeatedly in order to break their will, possibly sold into slavery, possibly kept for literal breeding stock, maybe tortured, ransom them off, etc etc etc.

    These regions that are high risk don't care about a western concept of "women's rights" or "equality". The bottom line is a woman, especially a western woman, is a prime target to much of the world living in turmoil. Women hold more value regardless of what these men do to them while waiting for their "payment" regardless of the form of payment. THAT is why they don't want scientists going to these areas, especially women. The woman does not have to be "attractive" for these things to happen, but it is almost certain to happen to a physically attractive woman if captured.

    The potential for such suffering does not necessarily justify the risk. It isn't about "leaving women out" or "gender discrimination". This is about the reality of the undeveloped world that does not share western views or thought but most certainly think that every westerner is VALUABLE in that they can get something for capturing that westerner. And yes, a country at war means that entire region is a risk. Terror groups, among other bad actors, still roam those rocky hills that seem to be deemed "Safe".

    Her work is great, her goals seem sincere. Her lecture was well thought out, articulated clearly and a pleasure to listen too. But she doesn't seem to want to acknowledge that some of the risks involved are far, far worse than death. Maybe even happen but still ends in death. She is also correct, use the local scientists to lead the research in their own region because they will be overlooked because they are Yemen, Somali, Indian, etc etc etc. They are likely to be left alone to do their work because they are nationals and are not worth anything to the bad actors. Local collaborators should be empowered and supported to advance research in their regions. IT is a wonderful idea with endless possibilities.

    I agree, geography is an issue for science. Not just for land based research but deep sea. We just can't reach some places and the reasons are varied. Risk is part of exploration and death is a real possibility. However death isn't the problem, it is the above mentioned things and many others to gruesome to discuss here that make the risk not worth it. We can all accept that a loved one died while doing their work, it is tragic and terrible. But imagine your loved one captured and going through unimaginable suffering because of the sin of being from the west that created an idea that they were worth a lot of money that you cannot provide. The adage that there is no reward without risk holds true, but not all risk is worth the gamble. An attractive woman like this captured in one of these places would suffer in ways that are far worse than death.

    Please understand, this is not a direct criticism of the speaker nor a call for woman to be banned from anything. I am merely pointing out the reasons some of these places are just too risky to go to.

  18. There goes the neighborhood. Unless it's protected from developers. Better have it declared one of those global treasures. Love those trees, how can I get one? Ooops, this is how it all begins. 😢 It's already too late. 😢

  19. It saddens me so deeply that such important work for the betterment of all humankind is restricted by borders, politics and conflict. 🙁

  20. With so many mistakes, and wrong choices as a species, out of spite for potentially unnecessary gains, a few decades down the road humanity will ask itself, where did we go wrong? And we won't have an answer, we won't know which to choose. . . .

  21. Doesn't evolutionary biology imply that some races of existing humans are more genetically primitive than others?

  22. Is she not gonna address how scientists want to conduct research like this but aren’t given the funding to do so? Why is she blaming the scientists when they don’t have money to do it? People need to stop blaming everything on scientists when they’re not to blame for anything.

  23. She didnt make ANY discoveries, so what is this talk about ? She being a "heroine" because she wanted to go to yemen ? boring

  24. "We need to accept pedophilia as a sexual preference"-Ted Talks "we need to respect pedophiles the same way we respect other people"-Ted Talks

  25. Science has an evolution problem. No direct descents. You can posit as many branch species as you like. But there must be a direct descent for every organism or they were created.

  26. Within less than the first minute she manages to bash creationists, to put on some 'power girl' attitude and to deliver a feminist joke :o| (is there such a thing?). Talk of a turn off.
    The title was interesting, but the first minute + the description of the video turned out to be all one needs to know.
    TED, you're getting weaker and more PC with time. You've gotta look back in time, back to the roots!

  27. For her to fail mean she is one shity scientist. The science against evolution is overwhelmingly against it. It's a joke to even suggest that mutations account for any value to life level and creating it. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a fool and listens to the scientist not the science. Talk to synthetic biologist and they will let you know this never could have happened.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top